Lauritzen and Lundquist

Vintage documents, letters, newspaper ads, magazine articles and more -- a library at your fingertips!
Frank Flood
Cugine
Posts: 80
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 12:04 pm

Lauritzen and Lundquist

Postby Frank Flood » Sat Sep 03, 2011 3:24 pm

I recall some discussion in the past - somewhere, anyway - about the relative merits of the two American Film-Index volumes by Einer Lauritzen and Gunnar Lundquist. Any thoughts from the group as to their reliability?

Frank

Richard M Roberts
Godfather
Posts: 2895
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 6:30 pm

Re: Lauritzen and Lundquist

Postby Richard M Roberts » Sun Sep 04, 2011 6:05 am

Frank Flood wrote:I recall some discussion in the past - somewhere, anyway - about the relative merits of the two American Film-Index volumes by Einer Lauritzen and Gunnar Lundquist. Any thoughts from the group as to their reliability?

Frank


Those books are rife with errors, frequently made-up credits with no basis in reality or research.

RICHARD M ROBERTS

Frank Flood
Cugine
Posts: 80
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 12:04 pm

Re: Lauritzen and Lundquist

Postby Frank Flood » Sun Sep 04, 2011 9:37 pm

Richard - Thanks, that's what I had recalled hearing. Too bad; they're such nice big books.

Frank

Bob Birchard

Re: Lauritzen and Lundquist

Postby Bob Birchard » Wed Nov 09, 2011 8:08 am

The American Film Index volumes are quite useful, but not definitive. The basic stuff--transcribing information from "The Moving Picture World" is a great help, putting all this info together in thumbnail form. Did they miss things from MPW? Probably, but not much.

Where the books become problematic is in the use of secondary sources to fill out film credits. The compilers often seem to have incorporated the work of earlier researchers without checking.

There are problems with any such attempt to document films. One would think it would be easy, but there are always issues--especially in the days before the Screen Actors Guild insisted that actors have unique individual names. But even with the most diligent researchers it is easy for errors and omissions to creep in. And, in fact, even studio publicity materials can be wrong. I have copies of notes made by Hobart Bosworth correcting printed Selig bulletins regarding incorrect printed credits. How could one blame a researcher getting this information wrong without a "Rosetta Stone" like Bosworth's notes? And similarly, anyone who had access to such a "Rosetta Stone" would risk being "corrected" by those who only had access to the trade ads. Much as one might try, no such compilation of information is ever going to be perfect.

I have found the American Film Index to be a valuable (if not always perfect) resource through the years--more than worth the $300 or so I paid when they were published.


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests